Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02597
Original file (BC 2013 02597.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02597

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following awards: 

a.  Vietnam Service Medal (VSM).

b.  Small Arms Expert Marksman Ribbon (SAEMR). 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He is eligible for the VSM due to his temporary duty (TDY) assignments in participation of the Tet Offensive and he earned the SAEMR during basic military training (BMT).  He has each of these medals but without supporting documentation of the VSM, he is unable to join the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW).  

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 13 Sep 65.  

On 21 Jan 69, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Air Force and was credited with three years, four months, and nine days of total active service. 

On 23 Aug 13, AFPC/DPSID notified the applicant they were able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and will correct his records administratively.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is attached at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________




AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the VSM and SAEMR.  After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, there is no documentation in the applicant’s military personnel records verifying he was in the area of eligibility for the VSM or that he qualified as expert with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun.  The VSM is awarded to all service members of the Armed Services who between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, served in the following areas of Southeast Asia:  Vietnam and the contiguous waters and airspace; in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia or the airspace thereof and in the direct support of military operations in Vietnam for 30 consecutive days or 60 non-consecutive days.  However, according to his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, he was not credited with any foreign service and there are no other documents in his records that would substantiate that he served in the qualifying area of operations.  In regards to the SAEMR, it was authorized by the Secretary of the Air Force on 28 Aug 62 and is awarded to all United States Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 63, qualify as “expert” in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant argues he received the VSM while TDY to Hickam AFB and provided three pictures of his tour of duty.  He is unable to decipher how he can provide any further information regarding his direct support of military operations in Vietnam for 30 consecutive days.  However, through research, verification can be made of his TDY to Fort Campbell, Kentucky in January 1968 and Chicago in August 1968.  Also, he reiterated that he was awarded the SAEMR ribbon for receiving a perfect score in shooting the M-16 while attending BMT.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit E.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has not exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2.  The application was not timely filed; however it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.  

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission, including his response to the Air Force evaluation, in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  We note that AFPC/DPSID has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the AFOUA and corrected his records administratively.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting any relief beyond that rendered administratively.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02597 in Executive Session on 6 Mar 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 May 13.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 23 Aug 13. 
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Sep 13.




                                   
                                   Chair





3







Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04710

    Original file (BC-2012-04710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04710 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be updated to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR) and any other awards he may be eligible to receive. The remaining...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01030

    Original file (BC-2005-01030.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01030 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect award of the Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM), the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V), the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02295

    Original file (BC 2014 02295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02295 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following medals/ribbon: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05444

    Original file (BC 2013 05444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam Service Medal with a Silver Service Star (VSM w/SSS) Army Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with one Bronze Service Star (SAEMR w/1BSS) Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is authorized the requested awards and it is unclear as to why the awards from his original DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03108

    Original file (BC 2014 03108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on his dates in Vietnam, DPSID was able to verify he is authorized two Bronze Service Stars (BSS) to the VSM for his participation in the Vietnam Defensive Campaign and Vietnam Air Campaign. Campaign streamers are embroidered swallow-tailed ribbons of the same design as campaign or service medals awarded to members for service in a named campaign. Based on review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, DPSID was able to determine that the below Air Force Medals and/or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03049

    Original file (BC 2014 03049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 63, qualified as “expert” in small arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issued handgun. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID notes the applicant’s entitlement RVGC w/P, AFLSA, AFOUA, PUC, Vietnam Service Medal with four Bronze...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02083

    Original file (BC 2013 02083.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects award of the VSM, however, DPSID is unable to substantiate the applicant was in the area of eligibility for this award. Furthermore, if the Board accepts the order as proof of Vietnam service, it only indicates 10 days, which does not meet the 30 day criteria for award of the VSM or the 6 month criteria for award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. The following documentary evidence in AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2013-02083 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02402

    Original file (BC-2011-02402.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His military service record be corrected to reflect the time he served in Vietnam. DPAPP states they could not verify any time served in Vietnam or Thailand. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to reflect service in Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03773

    Original file (BC-2012-03773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) c. Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM) d. National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) e. Air Force Longevity Service Award (AFLSA) Upon final board decision, administrative correction of the applicant's official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOY. The complete DPSID evaluation is at exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response the applicant...